Hoofdstuk 47 Referenties

Abdi, H. (2003). Factor rotations in factor analyses. Encyclopedia for Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA, 792–795.
AERA, APA, & NCEM. (1999). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.
AERA, APA, & NCEM. (2014). Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing. American Educational Research Association.
Anscombe, F. J. (1973). Graphs in Statistical Analysis. Analysis, 27(1), 17–21. https://doi.org/gjs3bw
Association, A. P. (Ed.). (2019). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (Seventh edition). American Psychological Association.
Benjamin, D. J., Berger, J. O., Johannesson, M., Nosek, B. A., Wagenmakers, E.-J., Berk, R., Bollen, K. A., Brembs, B., Brown, L., Camerer, C., Cesarini, D., Chambers, C. D., Clyde, M., Cook, T. D., De Boeck, P., Dienes, Z., Dreber, A., Easwaran, K., Efferson, C., … Johnson, V. E. (2018). Redefine statistical significance. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
Borsboom, D., Cramer, A. O. J., Kievit, R. A., Scholten, A. Z., & Franić, S. (2009). The end of construct validity. In The concept of validity: Revisions, new directions, and applications (pp. 135–170). IAP Information Age Publishing.
Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & Heerden, J. van. (2004). The Concept of Validity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 1061–1071. http://um0122.unimaas.nl:9003/sfx_local?sid=SP:PSYI&genre=article&atitle=The Concept of Validity.&title=Psychological-Review&isbn=&issn=0033-295X&date=2004&volume=111&issue=4&spage=1061&pid=%3CAN%3E2004-19012-010%3C/AN%3E%3CAU%3EBorsboom,-Denny%7C$%7CMell
Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 1904-1920, 3(3), 296–322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00207.x
Bullock, John G., & Green, D. P. (2021). The Failings of Conventional Mediation Analysis and a Design-Based Alternative. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 4(4), 251524592110472. https://doi.org/gm5w4n
Bullock, John G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 550–558. https://doi.org/bw5pxx
Cohen, J. (1990). Things I Have Learned (So Far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312. https://doi.org/bhd52q
Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1996). Are humans good intuitive statisticians after all? Rethinking some conclusions from the literature on judgment under uncertainty. Cognition, 58(1), 1–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00664-8
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040957
Cronbach, L. J., & Shavelson, R. J. (2004). My Current Thoughts on Coefficient Alpha and Successor Procedures. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(3), 391–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404266386
Crutzen, R. (2014). Time is a jailer: What do alpha and its alternatives tell us about reliability? The European Health Psychologist, 1(2), 70–74.
Crutzen, R., & Peters, G.-J. Y. (2017). Scale quality: Alpha is an inadequate estimate and factor-analytic evidence is needed first of all. Health Psychology Review, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2015.1124240
Crutzen, R., & Peters, G.-J. Y. (2018). Evolutionary learning processes as the foundation for behaviour change. Health Psychology Review, 12(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1362569
Cuijpers, P., & Cristea, I. A. (2016). How to prove that your therapy is effective, even when it is not: A guideline. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences, 25(5), 428–435. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045796015000864
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and Changing Behavior: The Reasoned Action Approach. Taylor & Francis Group.
Fisher, R., Aylmer, & Wishart, J. (1930). The arrangement of field experiments and the statistical reduction of the results. https://doi.org/10.23637/ROTHAMSTED.8V20Y
Fried, E. I. (2017). What are psychological constructs? On the nature and statistical modeling of emotions, intelligence, personality traits and mental disorders. Health Psychology Review, 11(2), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1306718
Gigerenzer, G. (1996). Why do frequency formats improve Bayesian reasoning? Cognitive algorithms work on information, which needs representation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19(01), 23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00041248
Gignac, G. E., & Szodorai, E. T. (2016). Effect size guidelines for individual differences researchers. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 74–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.06.069
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26
Gruijters, S. L. K., & Peters, G.-J. Y. (2020). Meaningful change definitions: Sample size planning for experimental intervention research. Psychology & Health, 1–16. https://doi.org/ghpnx8
Hoffrage, U. (2002). Representation facilitates reasoning: What natural frequencies are and what they are not. Cognition, 84(3), 343–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00050-1
Hoog, N. D., Stroebe, W., & Wit, J. B. F. de. (2007). The impact of vulnerability to and severity of a health risk on processing and acceptance of fear-arousing communications: A meta-analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11(3), 258.
Horst, A. M., Hill, A. P., & Gorman, K. B. (2020). Palmerpenguins: Palmer archipelago (antarctica) penguin data. https://allisonhorst.github.io/palmerpenguins/
Kane, M. (2013). The Argument-Based Approach to Validation. School Psychology Review, 42(4), 448–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087465
Kok, G., Peters, G.-J. Y., Kessels, L. T. E., Hoor, G. A. ten, & Ruiter, R. A. C. (2018). Ignoring theory and misinterpreting evidence: The false belief in fear appeals. Health Psychology Review, 12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1415767
Kraemer, Helena C., & Blasey, C. M. (2004). Centring in regression analyses: A strategy to prevent errors in statistical inference. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 13(3), 141–151. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15297898
Kraemer, Helena Chmura, Mintz, J., Noda, A., Tinklenberg, J., & Yesavage, J. A. (2006). Caution regarding the use of pilot studies to guide power calculations for study proposals. Archives of General Psychiatry, 63(5), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.63.5.484
Kuder, G. F., & Richardson, M. W. (1937). The theory of the estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika, 2(3), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02288391
Kyriazos, T. A. (2018). Applied Psychometrics: Sample Size and Sample Power Considerations in Factor Analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in General. Psychology, 09(08), 2207–2230. https://doi.org/ggcvgs
Lakens, D. (2021). Sample Size Justification [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9d3yf
Lakens, D., Adolfi, F. G., Albers, C. J., Anvari, F., Apps, M. A. J., Argamon, S. E., Assen, M. A. L. M. van, Baguley, T., Becker, R. B., Benning, S. D., Bradford, D. E., Buchanan, E. M., Caldwell, A., Calster, B. van, Carlsson, R., Chen, S.-C., Chung, B., Colling, L. J., Collins, G., … Zwaan, R. A. (2017). Justify Your Alpha [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/9s3y6
Lovakov, A., & Agadullina, E. (2017). Empirically derived guidelines for interpreting effect size in social psychology. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/2epc4
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4(1), 84. https://doi.org/bhr39c
Maier, M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Justify Your Alpha: A Primer on Two Practical Approaches. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/ts4r6
Marsman, M., Borsboom, D., Kruis, J., Epskamp, S., Bork, R. van, Waldorp, L. J., Maas, H. L. J. van der, & Maris, G. (2018). An Introduction to Network Psychometrics: Relating Ising Network Models to Item Response Theory Models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 53(1), 15–35. https://doi.org/gfj8tt
Mcneish, D. (2017). Thanks Coefficient Alpha, We’ll Take it From Here. Psychological Methods.
McNeish, D., & Wolf, M. G. (2019). Thinking Twice About Sum Scores. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/3wy47
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012). Identifying careless responses in survey data. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028085
Moinester, M., & Gottfried, R. (2014). Sample size estimation for correlations with pre-specified confidence interval. The Quantitative Methods of Psychology, 10(2), 124–130. http://tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol10-2/p124/
Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716–aac4716. https://doi.org/68c
Orben, A., & Lakens, D. (2020). Crud (Re)Defined. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 3(2), 238–247. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920917961
Pearl, J. (2009). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803161
Pearson, R. H., & Mundform, D. J. (2010). Recommended Sample Size for Conducting Exploratory Factor Analysis on Dichotomous Data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 9(2), 359–368. https://doi.org/c7dn
Peters, G.-J. Y. (2014a). A practical guide to effective behavior change: How to identify what to change in the first place. European Health Psychologist, 16(5), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/hy7mj
Peters, G.-J. Y. (2014b). The alpha and the omega of scale reliability and validity: Why and how to abandon Cronbach’s alpha and the route towards more comprehensive assessment of scale quality. European Health Psychologist, 16(2), 56–69. https://doi.org/10.17605/osf.io/tnrxv
Peters, G.-J. Y., & Crutzen, R. (2017a). Confidence in constant progress: Or how pragmatic nihilism encourages optimism through modesty. Health Psychology Review, 11(2), 140–144.
Peters, G.-J. Y., & Crutzen, R. (2017b). Pragmatic nihilism: How a Theory of Nothing can help health psychology progress. Health Psychology Review, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1284015
Peters, G.-J. Y., & Gruijters, S. (2021). Ufs: A collection of utilities. https://r-packages.gitlab.io/ufs
Peters, G.-J. Y., Ruiter, R. A. C., & Kok, G. (2013). Threatening communication: A critical re-analysis and a revised meta-analytic test of fear appeal theory. Health Psychology Review, 7(Suppl 1), S8–S31. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2012.703527
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
Roe, R. A. (2012). What is wrong with mediators and moderators? The European Health Psychologist, 14(1), 4–10.
Rohrer, J. M. (2018). Thinking Clearly About Correlations and Causation: Graphical Causal Models for Observational Data. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(1), 27–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245917745629
Rohrer, J. M., Hünermund, P., Arslan, R. C., & Elson, M. (2021). That’s a lot to PROCESS! Pitfalls of Popular Path Models [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/paeb7
Rosenthal, J. A. (1996). Qualitative descriptors of strength of association and effect size. Journal of Social Service Research, 21(4), 37–59. https://doi.org/bcfsp2
Schilling, M. F., Watkins, A. E., & Watkins, W. (2002). Is Human Height Bimodal? The American Statistician, 56(3), 223–229. https://doi.org/ctr8q8
Sonderen, E. van, Sanderman, R., & Coyne, J. C. (2013). Ineffectiveness of reverse wording of questionnaire items: Let’s learn from cows in the rain. PloS One, 8(7), e68967. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0068967
Spearman, C. (1910). Correlation calculated from faulty data. British Journal of Psychology, 1904-1920, 3(3), 271–295. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8295.1910.tb00206.x
Stoll, M., Mancini, A., Hubenschmid, L., Dreimüller, N., König, J., Cuijpers, P., Barth, J., & Lieb, K. (2020). Discrepancies from registered protocols and spin occured frequently in randomized psychotherapy trials – a meta-epidemiologic study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.08.013
Trafimow, D., & Marks, M. (2015). Editorial. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 37(February), 1–2. https://doi.org/4z8
Van De Schoot, R., Schmidt, P., De Beuckelaer, A., Lek, K., & Zondervan-Zwijnenburg, M. (2015). Editorial: Measurement Invariance. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01064
Viechtbauer, W., Smits, L., Kotz, D., Budé, L., Spigt, M., Serroyen, J., Crutzen, R., Bud??, L., Spigt, M., Serroyen, J., & Crutzen, R. (2015). A simple formula for the calculation of sample size in pilot studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 68(11), 1375–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.04.014
Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. Springer-Verlag New York. https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
Winter*, J. C. F. de, Dodou*, D., & Wieringa, P. A. (2009). Exploratory Factor Analysis With Small Sample Sizes. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(2), 147–181. https://doi.org/bczhf7
Witte, K. (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59(4), 329–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759209376276
Wolf, M. G., Ihm, E. D., Maul, A., & Taves, A. (2019). Survey Item Validation [Preprint]. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k27w3
Yorkin, M., Spaccarotella, K., Martin-Biggers, J., Quick, V., & Byrd-Bredbenner, C. (2013). Accuracy and consistency of weights provided by home bathroom scales. BMC Public Health, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1194